Judge John C. Sullivan of the Los Angeles Superior Court ruled that the law requiring women to sit on corporate boards is unconstitutional.

Jerry Brown, the then-governor of California, signed the bill into law in 2018. But it was obvious to most constitutional scholars from the outset that the law didn’t have a prayer of surviving a court test. It violated the equal protection clause of the California and U.S. constitutions by mandating a gender-based quota. Another similar law that required racial representation on boards for corporations was overturned by the court last month.

California’s radicals have been disappointed by the ruling.

Associated Press:

Toni Atkins, a San Diego Democrat, said “the ruling was disappointing. It serves to remind us that sometimes our legalities don’t match our reality. ”

Atkins stated, “having more women on corporate boards results in better business decisions and higher performance than the competition”.

Our “legalities” are, in case you hadn’t noticed, our “reality”. They don’t match the fevered imaginations of left-wing radicals.

It is acceptable to recognize past injustices even if numerical quotas are not applicable. Atkins believes that the solution must be compatible with existing law.

The state-supported the law and argued that it was constitutional as it reversed discrimination that favors women. The law was also adopted after other measures had failed.

Although the law could result in severe penalties for failing to file an annual return and complying with it, the chief secretary of state’s office admitted that it wasn’t toothless during the trial.

Betsy Bogart said that no fines had ever been imposed or intended to impose them. Alex Padilla, the former Secretary, wrote to Brown warning him that it was unlikely that the law would be enforced.

This law did not address the issue of a shortage of women on corporate boards. The government attempted to force private companies into implementing a social policy that the Democrats knew would fail legal scrutiny.

This was not the first attempt of the Democratic legislature in California to intimidate private businesses.

The post California’s Law Requiring Women on Corporate Boards Ruled Unconstitutional appeared first on Conservative Research Group.

The draft of a new map of the congressional districts for New York seems to be a huge boost to Republicans, compared to the original lines drawn by Democratic legislators.

After a January ruling that incorrect gerrymandering had resulted in the initial map being drawn, the Democrats’ plan was scrapped. Redistricting was then done by a court-appointed special judge.

“[A]bsolutely brute in what’s probably their most unfavorable environments since ’94,” Neal Kwatra, a Democratic consultant and ex-chief of staff to the New York attorney General, tweeted in response.

Online, an interactive version of this map can be accessed by Jonathan Cervas, the special master appointed by Judge Patrick McAllister to manage the new congressional mapping.

Next, the public has until Wednesday to submit input to McAllister’s new map. The final map will be due Friday according to City&State New York.

According to the outlet, the first map placed Democrats in a clear favored position in 22 districts of the state. The new map featured eight districts that could be either.

One change from the proposed map could complicate the House’s existing composition, because it would place Jerrold Nadler, chairman of House Judiciary Committee, and Carolyn Maloney chairperson of House Oversight Committee in the same district.

Democrats sought an emergency injunction from a federal court to stop the decision that the original map was not compliant with proper procedure. The effort was rejected by U.S. District Judge Lewis Kaplan last week.

The post Draft Of NY Congressional Redistricting Map Absolutely Brutal For Dems appeared first on Conservative Research Group.

It may seem strange to teens that men didn’t have access to tampons in America’s restrooms during the 1960s. Walls that contained urinals were once the walls of cottonless wastelands. However, that dark age is likely to end thanks to the Oregon state legislature. The Menstrual Dignity Act was signed by Kate Brown, Democrat Governor of Rhode Island, in 2021.

Every public education provider must ensure that students have access to sanitary pads and tampons at no charge through dispensers in every school’s student bathroom.

It is clear: A “Student bathroom” is a bathroom accessible to students. It includes a gender-neutral bathroom, a female-only bathroom, and a male-only bathroom.

House Bill 3294 will become effective July 1, 2019. Boys will be able to receive period care at school during the 2022-23 school year.

Fox News pointed out that the law applies to all restrooms, regardless of age.

Lately, Tampons have been the center of attention. Menstrual products were never front and center in history. They seem to be really enjoying it.

However, not everyone is thrilled about boys finding ovarian accessories next to their toilets. Bridget Barton, the GOP’s gubernatorial candidate, is one example.

She has harsh words for soft supplements

“This is an implosion total of the family; it’s a violation of the family.”

According to Bridget, confusion can result from:

It’s confusing for children. Then, when they reach puberty, they have more confusion about their bodies, have real difficulty understanding their world, and go into depression. We’re seeing more evidence that’s causing them to be confused, and depressed, have to act out, and have serious problems in the future.

It is not hard to imagine a boy asking “Where do you put this?”. Hopefully, he will find the answers.

Bridget states that parents are disturbed by the idea of fibrous bullets being loaded into boys’ bathroom stalls.

“Complaints” isn’t a good description of it. Many parents haven’t heard about the background information that teachers will be required to teach in sex classes and health classes. It’s almost unbelievable, I hear from parents all over the country.

Hence: They are in shock. They are in disbelief. They’re angry. They’re leaving the schools fast and Oregon has run out of charter schools and private schools for them.

Oregon is a state that places a lot of emphasis on education’s effectiveness. Therefore, improvements have been made.

Oregon Department of Education links standardized testing to White supremacy, @JessicaChasmar reports: https://t.co/kirYIeJUBL

— Peter J. Hasson (@peterjhasson) February 15, 2022

The February Fox article:

Monday’s workgroup at the Oregon Department of Education (ODE), declared that standardized testing was rooted in White supremacy, and has been “weaponized against students of color”. …

After Democratic Gov. Kate Brown signed a July bill that removed the requirement that high school students demonstrate proficiency in math, reading, and writing before they can graduate.

The school system is concerned about white supremacy but is dedicated to white personal products.

There’s also more to the story: While Oregon fights racism in public education and Oregon is promoting homeschooling, some of that “antiracist work” is being countered by the tampon takeover.

According to MSNBC, at least that’s what it seems. It’s as insidious as a period without the right accessories.

It may seem harmless, but the insidious racism of the American religious right’s obsession with homeschooling speaks volumes, writes @AntheaButler. https://t.co/cETwck5n27

— MSNBC (@MSNBC) May 13, 2022

The post Oregon Education Stocks the Boys Room With Tampons appeared first on Conservative Research Group.