Top House Republicans weigh in on reports that “Disinformation Governance Board”, the Biden administration’s disinformation governance board, has been suspended following heavy criticisms over free speech concerns. They claim it’s the “best” decision by the Biden Administration due to its clearly political intent. According to sources, Wednesday’s disinformation board was placed on hold by The Associated Press and Nina Jankowicz will resign.

“The DHS Disinformation Governance Board suspension is the best decision made regarding this Orwellian entity. The ‘Ministry of Truth’ had no clear mission or direction from its initial botched rollout. It was obvious that it was a political tool to use by the party in power,” Rep. John Katko (R-N.Y.), ranking member of House Committee on Homeland Security and Rep. Mike Turner (R-Ohio), ranking member of House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence in a joint statement.

Turner and Katko continued, “This board was only effective in reinforcing the Department of Homeland Security’s priorities are severely misplaced.” Cyber-attacks by adversaries threaten to cripple our critical infrastructure. The rise in violent crime puts Americans in danger. DHS is now focusing on protecting Americans’ freedom of speech.

“DHS isn’t managing its current missions. Why would we trust the same Department to unilaterally increase its mission and tell people what truth is?” This administration needs to be focused on national security and not make itself the ultimate arbiter between truth and speech. The Republicans of Homeland and Intelligence Committee will continue to work to ensure that this Board does not get off the ground,” they concluded.

Fox News was informed by the Department of Homeland Security that the board would be suspended for 75-days pending review and approval of the bipartisan Homeland Security Advisory Council.

Alejandro Mayorkas, DHS Secretary, “has asked the HSAC to make its final recommendations within seventy days.” The HSAC’s review will result in the Board not meeting and its work being halted. However, the Department’s crucial work across multiple administrations to address disinformation which threatens the security our country will continue.” A spokesperson said that the Board had been “grossly, intentionally mischaracterized.”

The White House also criticized the board’s critics while insisting that the board’s goals were correct.

“These smears by right-wing actors against a deeply trained expert and against efforts in better combating human smuggling, domestic terrorism and human smuggling are disgusting and the administration has repeatedly spoken out against them,” White House Deputy Press Secretary Andrew Bates said to Fox News on Wednesday.

“Nina Jankowicz and the board do not have any involvement in censorship or removing content from any source. They are responsible for keeping national security officials informed about how misinformation affects the threat environment. “She has strong credentials and a history in calling out misinformation from both left and right,” Sullivan said.

Both the left and right-leaning lawmakers criticized Jankowicz for his repeated statements discrediting the Hunter Biden laptop story as a “Trump campaign product” or a “Russian influence operation.”

The House Homeland Security Committee Republicans wrote to Mayorkas earlier this month to demand basic information about the agency, including the organization, members, schedule, and recommendations of the disinformation board. According to the Fox News Digital letter, they also criticised Mayorkas for confusingly rolling out the board.

Mayorkas announced the creation of a disinformation board by DHS to combat online misinformation at a House Appropriations Committee hearing last week.

The New York Times, far-left, writes that “no overriding explanation” has been found for the drop in enrollments at public schools. “Gee, what could have caused that?” “Has anything unusual happened in the past two years?” asked Ed Morrissey from Hot Air.

The Times does suggest that maybe-perhaps-possibly the plunge in national putblic school enrollment has something to do with these government-run debacles closing down for months and months for no valid scientific reason — unless, of course, you consider teachers Zooming from Aruba a valid scientific reason. Or maybe-perhaps-possibly it was forcing little kids to wear masks for no valid scientific reason.

Hey, I’ve got a reason the Times didn’t consider… Maybe-perhaps-possibly it has to do with the legions of predators and groomers in public schools, all the innocence-shattering gay porn, the drag queens, and the transsexual voodoo?

You think maybe-perhaps-possibly decent parents find it demonic that government-run schools teach boys how to give other boys hummers but can’t teach them how to read?

It is amazing to see the New York Times go to such great lengths to protect its subscribers who are neurotic and brittle.

The good news is that America’s indefensible public school system is now feeling some pain for its child abuse. Too little pain. The depraved institution, and the public unions that made it depraved, will never feel enough pain. There is some pain…

According to the Times, New York suffered a net loss in students of 50,000; Michigan lost 50,000; Los Angeles lost 43,000 students; Chicago lost 25,000 and even Kansas City’s suburbs lost 1,000 of its 33,000 students.

According to the Times, “All in all, America’s public school system has lost at least 1.2million students since 2020.”

Even better: “State enrollment numbers show no sign that there will be a rebound to previous national levels anytime soon.”

Marguerite Roza at Georgetown University’s Something-Something department, said to the Times that “this has been a seismic impact on public education.” “School finances have been really shaken. This shouldn’t be compared to a rubber band which bounces back to its original position.

She added, “When you lose children, you lose money.” “You must close schools and layoff people.

Burn, baby, burn.

The Times reported this as a negative thing.

I am aware that there are decent public schools and decent teachers. However, I know that America’s government-run schools system is corrupt and perverse. It funnels billions of taxpayer money through teachers’ unions to Democrat Party campaign coffers.

The death of America’s public schools system (vouchers available for all) would make America’s children healthier. The death of the Walt Disney Company, a degenerate child-grooming facility.

For years, the nonprofit Black Lives Matter Global Network Foundation has been under fire for its finances. This week, new tax filings revealed large payments to co-founders’ friends and significant real investment investments. RedState previously reported on the controversial purchase of a Los Angeles home for $6 million by the group in 2020.

According to The Associated Press:

The Black Lives Matter Global Network Foundation Inc. has shared a new, 63-page Form 990 exclusively with The Associated Press. It reports that it invested $32,000,000 in stocks from $90 million it received in donations during racial justice demonstrations in 2020. Organizers say that the investment will be used to create an endowment to support the foundation’s future work. It closed its last fiscal year, which ran from July 1, 2020, through June 30, 2021, with almost $42 million in net assets. According to one board member, the foundation had an operating budget of around $4 million.

The revelations that the foundation paid almost $970,000 to a company established by a man who had a child with BLM co-founder PatrisseCullors and that they also paid $840,000 to a brother’s security company were sure to raise eyebrows. Cullors also received more than $73,000 in private plane trips from the foundation, but she has since repaid them.

The foundation spent $37 million in 2021 in grants, consultants, real property ($12 million), and other expenses. However, it still has $42 million.

Patrisse, the co-founder of the group, resigned in 2021 after the controversies grew. However, he addressed the controversies Monday on an MSNBC podcast. Cullors spoke out about the flood of donations that the group received following the death of George Floyd.

It was indeed a shock. It was also quite a shock. It was a lot of white guilt money. White people are often like “We just have to get the money.”

She explained further that the group did not have the infrastructure to handle the huge influx and now she is being “weaponized”.

However, the Associated Press points out that there are some real problems.

According to the tax filing, the organization is still struggling to find its feet. It does not have an executive director or in-house staff. The AP was told by non-profit experts that the BLM Foundation seems to be a small, resource-strapped organization. However, some argue that Black-led charities are subject to unfair scrutiny in an overwhelmingly wealthy philanthropic environment.

There’s always fire where there’s smoke. Despite the good intentions of the foundation, it is likely that donors are wondering where their money went.

Does diversity in thought equal white supremacy? This is what a professor at a college believes.

Campus Reform reported that faculty recently met to discuss Critical Race Theory. It was hosted at Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis and was organized by the Critical Race Studies in Education Association.

This website explains the mission statement for CRSEA:

Our commitment is to (1) fight systemic and institutional racism through scholarship and practice and (2) acknowledge multiple places of oppression as well as the myriad manifestations thereof, and (3) co-constructing liberating information that facilitates collective agency in transforming schools, communities, and communities.

The meet-up featured discussions by instructors about whiteness, the current blight.

Campus Reform witnesses claim Campus Reform raped an educator at a California college.

“Whiteness is built against darkness.” One conference-goer said that blackness is inherently violent. There is no virtue. Michael Dumas, a University of California Berkeley professor who spoke at the conference, was specifically referred to.

Dumas claimed that America and “Whiteness” know each other through violence. Another attendee said that Dumas was quoted as saying that “no whiteness is not already violent.”

These tweets were CR-quoted. It appears that they have been deleted or made public.

Dumas has shared similar views in recent times. Dumas also tweeted that whiteness is violent and delusional delighting in Black Death in all historical periods and that justice would never come to America because it was built upon violence.

The outlet also relays a second description from Indiana University–Purdue Professor James Scheurich. Scheurich said that “research” was an elite colonial white supremacist effort.

Here’s more:

Professor Theodore Berry said that “some people should just be made awake.”

Campus Reform was told by her that the incident of marginalization or the “slap” was what she meant.

One University of Chicago Ph.D. student concluded her conference by noting that it was a pleasure to have “a few tears”.

David Stovall from the University of Illinois at Chicago made the most shocking claim at this conference.

He stated that “White Tears” were an act of political and physical violence.

Windex works to improve whiteness, wakefulness, and sleep quality.

This option is very popular in schools.

It’s being fought by many, not just academics.

Chuck Todd, MSNBC host is doing his part.

Freedom of speech is a code for white supremacy. Or, to go back to the conference, diversity in thought equals racism.

America faces significant problems to resolve

It doesn’t seem like we will be able to solve all of them quickly.

Tucker Carlson is a man who doesn’t care about the people he considers his friends. He has a history of attacking Republicans that whom he doesn’t agree, regardless of whether they agree to be on his show. Carlson made a snide dig at Dan Crenshaw (R.TX), calling him “eyepatch McCain”.

Crenshaw is a vocal supporter of the recent $40 billion Ukraine assistance package. He has criticized those who oppose the bill by suggesting they support Russia. This is the exchange between Crenshaw and Marjorie Taylor Greene, which seemed to kick off all of this.

Yes, I think it is a smart idea to invest in the destruction and defeat of our enemy’s military without losing one American soldier. Crenshaw said, “You should feel the exact same.”

Greene intervened, claiming that Crenshaw is funding a “proxy war” with Russia.

So you think that we are financing a proxy war against Russia? As if Ukrainian lives were worthless, you speak like they should be thrown out. Greene wrote, “Just used and thrown out.” For your proxy war? What does this do for Americans? What does this all mean?

Crenshaw responded, “Still going for that slot on Russia Today, huh?”

This exchange shows that there is a small but significant divide within the Republican Party. A minority of legislators have opposed multiple bills targeting Russia or supporting Ukraine.

Crenshaw and Greene both have been beef eaters in the past so it is not surprising that they would clash again. Carlson did seem to be paying attention to his comments, but so did later Fox News comments with Trey Gowdy, in which Crenshaw dismissed concerns over the shortage of baby formula in relation to the Ukraine bill.

This is The Daily Wire

“Do you know how much baby food formula $40 billion could buy?” Crenshaw stated that none, according to Fox News’ guest host Trey Gowdy (former Republican).

Here’s the video that Carlson made of his insult.

TUCKER: Dan Crenshaw is “Eyepatch McCain”pic.twitter.com/hh979Zm29J

— Election Wizard (@ElectionWiz) May 17, 2022

While I agree with Crenshaw’s views, I don’t like the new moniker. It shouldn’t be mockingly funny for a man to give his eye in defense of the country. Carlson thought so four years ago when he vigorously defended Crenshaw during a Saturday Night Live skit that made fun of Crenshaw’s injury.

However, I do understand that politics can’t be a pillow fight and Crenshaw has been quite aggressive in going after people who think the $40 billion Ukraine aid package was a mistake. He even promoted the notion that its opponents support Russia.

Crenshaw is on my side. Although I support Ukraine and have sent some aid, I believe that the $40 billion expense is an ineffective way to deal with the issue due to the excessive top-line and lack of oversight. Chip Roy recently made a viral rant about the process and I can assure you that neither I nor Chip Roy supports Vladimir Putin.

Crenshaw, on the other hand, was asked about Tucker Carlson’s culpability in connection to the Buffalo shooting. He defended Fox News host Tucker Carlson, but also expressed his feelings about him.

Tucker Carlson is a hateful person. I despise him. Crenshaw said that he did not cause the problem. Crenshaw said, “Like I believe he’s grossly flawed.” It doesn’t necessarily mean his rhetoric caused it. This was the result of a truly insane person.”

While Crenshaw is correct about Carlson being not responsible for the mass shooter who called Fox News an Israeli conspiracy, I hope figures on the right will try their best to avoid these types of slap fights. The country is in crisis. The country is currently in crisis. There is a shortage of baby formula, inflation is high, gasoline prices are at $5 per gallon, the stock markets are crashing, and, to Crenshaw’s surprise, Russia continues to invade European countries.

Right now, people are being crushed. It is not the time for people on the right to vent their frustrations about each other. The focus should be on the November election, which will see Republicans win a significant electoral victory. I’m not going to accuse anyone of being Putin supporters or make jokes about a man’s war injury. Although I realize that this conclusion won’t be a happy one for either side, I don’t see any value in these fights. Let it go and move on to the important things.

The post Dan Crenshaw Responds to Tucker Carlson After Eye-Patch McCain Jab appeared first on Conservative Research Group.

John Durham’s Special Counsel team finally brought Marc Elias (a former Clinton campaign lawyer) to the stand on Wednesday. Sussmann was accused of lying to the FBI about the debunked Alfa-Bank “connections” to the Trump campaign but denied that he was representing a client. Durham claims that Sussmann was actually Rodney Joffe’s tech executive.

We previously reported that the prosecution wanted big names to be called in its case. Marc Elias, an ex-Clinton campaign lawyer, was a partner at Perkins Coie which was owned by Sussmann.

Elias was called on Wednesday to testify in support of the prosecution. Elias testified that Fusion was also working with DNC to help it on the Clinton campaign.

Elias said that he spoke primarily to Robby Mook (Clinton campaign manager), but also with John Podesta, Jennifer Palmieri, campaign spokesperson, and Jake Sullivan, campaign strategy director.

Elias stated that he had spoken with Hillary Clinton “infrequently”, but was present at meetings in which she might have been present.

Elias claimed they made a public statement about the Alfa Bank allegations before the election. Hillary Clinton shared the false story via Twitter.

It’s time for Trump to answer serious questions about his ties to Russia. https://t.co/D8oSmyVAR4 pic.twitter.com/07dRyEmPjX

— Hillary Clinton (@HillaryClinton) October 31, 2016

Fox News:

Clinton also shared a statement from Jake Sullivan, which stated that “This could possibly be the most direct link between Donald Trump and Moscow.” Computer scientists found a secret server linking the Trump Organization to a Russian bank.

Sullivan said that Trump’s Russian ties may be unraveled by the “secret hotline”.

Sullivan stated that federal authorities could only assume that Trump and Russia are connected. This will be part of the ongoing probe into Russia’s interference in our election.

This is the most interesting part because Sussmann gave the false story to the FBI. Elias tried to minimize the idea that the FBI had received the information before October and distanced himself.

Elias stated that “The thing that makes an Oct surprise useful” was not that it happens in October, but that it arrives too late during the campaign process. ”

They agree that Sussmann attempted to pass it on to the FBI.

They were active in sharing the information with the media. Laura Seago was interviewed by the Durham team.

Laura Seago from Fusion testified that she met Marc Elias, and Sussmann to discuss the allegations about communications between Alfa Bank and the Trump Organization. He stated that they hoped to publish an essay.

The judge in the Sussmann case had already concluded that Fusion did more for Elias than simply providing information.

Cooper stated that “Fusion was more involved in the Alfa Bank allegations in providing information and analysis on Mr. Elias to help the Campaign assess defamation risk.”

Elias stated it was fair to say that they didn’t want the public to know that they were working with Fusion.

Elias was used in displaying the multiple calendar entries by the prosecution. This work was done for the Clinton campaign.

Sussmann & Nichols were invited to a calendar meeting on July 26th. The subject was “Marc/Michael/Fusion Team”, and the category was “Clinton”. Sussmann also authored a billing record stating that the Clinton campaign was the client. The subject was “General political advice” and the description was: “[redaction] Meeting With M. Elias and Others Concerning [redacted] confidential Project Redaction. ”

A second August 12th invitation sent by Nichols to Sussmann included the subject line “Meeting with Rodney” and indicated that it was confidential and related to meetings with M. Elias.

Elias stated that he remembered meeting Joffe and having an informal conversation with her. However, he claimed that his 2016 memory was “very fuzzy”.

Nichols also sent Lisa Patel, and Neustar, another email stating that Marc Elias (and Michael Sussmann) would like to schedule a 30-minute telephone conference with Rodney (on Rodney’s cell). The same message was also included in a meeting invitation. The same was true for a meeting invitation.

He said that he considered his work with Joffe, Sussmann, and on the Alfa-Bank claims a part of his Clinton campaign work.

The trial ended abruptly when the Sussmann lawyers were asked by the prosecution if Sussmann had disclosed to the FBI the Trump-Alfa Bank allegations against Clinton. Elias replied that they should have asked Sussmann. Sussmann’s answers were brought up by the prosecution.

The trial concerning Sussmann might not go according to plan. Now we have the official admission of Trump’s efforts and Clinton officials’ involvement in this effort.

The post Marc Elias Spills on Involvement With Clinton Team While Being Grilled in Sussmann Case appeared first on Conservative Research Group.

On Tuesday, Michael Sussmann will be tried as a Hillary Clinton apparatchik for spreading false conspiracy theories about Donald Trump. This follows the selection and trial of the jury. It is John Durham’s first major prosecution in the Russian collusion hoax investigation.

Sussmann’s previous attempts to dismiss the case failed after Durham responded with the skill to the contradictory arguments. The final decision will now be made by a jury that includes a Hillary Clinton donor as well as a woman who claims to be impartial regarding Donald Trump.

Many members of both the larger jury pool and those selected for the jury expressed a strong dislike for Trump and/or support for Clinton. Many said that they had not heard about the Sussmann case before the judge informed them.

One of the jurors said to the court that she remembered the 2016 election being a “misunderstood” and that there had been “a lot of shenanigans. She stated that Trump is a person she dislikes and she doesn’t believe she can be impartial if the case involves someone from his team. However, she noted that it could be impartial “if it’s about Trump.”

This case concerns Donald Trump, which is a problem. It’s not Trump associates on trial. The entire case hinges around Sussmann lying to the FBI about the Alfa Bank conspiracy theory. This claimed that the former president had secret servers communicating with the Russians.

How can a juror, who has stated that they are strongly animus towards Trump, be impartial when judging someone on trial for deliberately trying to destroy Trump’s credibility? This woman was able to make it to the final jury pool.

But she’s not the only one. Another juror revealed that they also donated to Hillary Clinton in 2016 and/or to Joe Biden in 2020. It seems unlikely that anyone would be disqualified for donating to any presidential campaign, given that most people don’t donate to them. There are many other potential jurors who aren’t too political to donate money to Clinton.

The jury itself is made up of only five men and 11 women. This is important. Women, particularly liberal women, are one of the most important demographics for the Democrat Party.

This is the problem when criminal trials are held against people involved in corruption at the federal level in Washington. DC was the most liberal in the country and voted 92.5 percent in favor of Biden during the last presidential election. It is amazing to see the bias among potential jurors. Beyond that, the Obama appointee who allowed these jurors to the pool is also the judge. Take what you want from this.

However, there is some good news. A conviction almost always comes about when a case against someone is filed.

However, I am skeptical that these stats will apply to the Sussmann trial. Federal court trials are almost always non-political. It is rare for Durham to do what he is doing, so it is a concern that he will be prosecuted fairly. I am a natural cynic about this stuff, given the lack of justice in the past.

We can still assume that Durham would choose to go to trial if he wanted to. Is it possible that the jury will view it this way? That is another matter.

Joe Biden is making billionaires restless.

We saw Jeff Bezos get wild on Biden over inflation. Elon Musk also took aim at Biden over inflation.

Musk seems to have started the questioning by trying to buy Twitter and preserve freedom of speech.

Musk made a podcast Monday ridiculing Biden’s reliance on the teleprompter and failure to address inflation.

Fox News:

Tesla CEO said that “the real president is the one who controls the teleprompter. ”

The CEO said that if someone was to accidentally reach for the Teleprompter, it would be like Anchorman. He was referring to the 2004 movie where Ron Burgundy reads the Teleprompter’s text even though it would endanger his career.

Musk said that the Trump administration “doesn’t seem to get anything done.”  “The Trump administration, leaving Trump aside, had many people who were efficient in getting things done. ”

One interviewer compared Joe to Bernie, the dead being pulled about all over in “Weekend At Bernie’s.”

Musk claimed that Biden was too closely controlled by the unions.

He has that right. The American public was falsely sold the story of the moderate Joe Biden who would return things to normal after all those “mean tweets.” Instead, it’s been a descent into a slew of radical leftist actions, as Biden reads, squints, and trips over his teleprompter constantly while wondering out loud if he’s doing what “they” want him to do.

Musk agreed with Bezos’ criticism of Biden — Biden tried to misdirect or muddy the causes of inflation

Musk stated, “It is obvious that inflation can be traced back to the fact that the government printed more money than it actually had. ”

Tesla’s CEO said that checks cannot be issued by the government to cover revenue exceeding the amount of revenue. “Inflation, you’re aware?” He said, “Inflation, you know? This is inflation. The velocity of money is constant”.

Musk insists this is “very simple” and “not super complicated”.

“If the government could just issue large amounts of money, without worrying about deficits then why not make them 100x larger?” “He said it would make the dollar useless.

Musk noted that “multiple countries” have tried this experiment many times. “Have You Ever Seen Venezuela?” “Like Venezuela’s poor, Venezuela’s poor have been run amok by their government.”

Musk said that it is impossible to create money like Venezuela without destroying the economy.

Joe Biden stated publicly that inflation was not caused by government spending. Bezos pointed to Sen. Joe Manchin (D.W.Va.), who blocked his Build Back Better Plan and saved Biden from making matters worse.

Musk stated that Twitter must be open to all and not just a few.

He said that he believes that there is a need for a digital public square that allows people to discuss all kinds of issues.

Musk stated that Twitter has a very left bias at the moment. Musk stated, “And I would be able to trust myself as a moderate and neither Republican nor Democrat. ”

He said that he was still committed to purchasing Twitter but wanted to know how many fake accounts/spambots were out there before finalizing the deal.

Karine Jean-Pierre, the White House Press Secretary, was mocked by conservatives on Twitter for not being able to answer a question about inflation on her first day in office.

Peter Doocy, Fox News White House correspondent, asked Jean-Pierre questions about a tweet by President Biden claiming that the only way to combat the current inflation rate is to ensure that the “wealthiest” corporations pay their fair share.

How can corporations be taxed to lower gas prices, food costs, and the cost for used cars? Doocy asked Jean-Pierre, and Jean-Pierre replied with a rambling, inconsistent statement that consisted of vague Democrat talking points about climate change and taxing the wealthy.

“So, let’s face it, we should encourage people who have done well, particularly those who care about climate, to support a fairer, non-changing tax code that doesn’t change – doesn’t charge manufacturers or workers, builders, or cops a higher percentage.

Jean-Pierre claimed that the “most fortunate” people in our country should not be allowed to “stand in the path of reducing energy prices” – although it was difficult to follow. He also talked about combating climate change and supporting basic collective bargaining rights. She advocated for a fair tax code, arguing that it was unfair for “manufacturing workers,” cops, to be subject to “higher taxes” than “folks who don’t pay taxes.”

Twitter users criticized the speech for being rambling and lacking in understanding. John Cooper, Heritage Foundation, tweeted “Big yikes.”

Matt Whitlock, Republican communications specialist, claimed Jean-Pierre’s handling was as bad or worse than a Vice President Kamala Hilary gaffe. He tweeted: “From the Kamala Hariri and Michael Scott School for Communications where you just begin a sentence, and see where it takes, regardless of what question was asked.”

Whitlock said that it looked like she might be reading the wrong answer from her written talk points here, regardless of Peter’s question. Talking points are fine, but it is best to try and answer a question.

J.D., Liberty Daily editor Rucker wrote that “It’s only Karine Jean Pierre’s first day, so we’ll give the benefit of doubt. It’s easy to dodge questions. She’ll eventually master the art of her predecessor and be able to blame Trump, Putin, and Peter Doocy, for all the evil in the world.

Twitter is in shock after Elon Musk declared that he would vote for Republicans during the midterm elections.

Musk stated that he would vote Republican in the upcoming election, despite having almost always voted Democrat during a live episode on the All-In Podcast recorded at a Miami tech conference.

He said, “I have voted overwhelmingly in favor of Democrats, historically – overwhelming.” It’s possible that I may never have voted in favor of a Republican. This election, I will.”

Tesla CEO, however, offered some insight into his motivation for switching to politics. He claimed that Democrats are not necessarily controlled by the people but rather by special interests.

He explained that “the issue is that the Democrat Party has been overly controlled both by the unions as well as by trial lawyers – especially the class action lawyers.”

He said, “And generally if something isn’t in the interests of the people of the Democrat side it’s going be because of unions – which is just another type of monopoly – and the trial lawyers.”

However, he did criticize Republicans. He claimed that their problems stem from “corporate evil” and “religious zealotry.” Musk claimed that he was a “moderate” during the past.

However, Twitter users were still stunned to hear that Musk would vote in the next election for Republicans.

Conservative radio host Buck Sexton praised this news and tweeted that Musk knew how insane it would be for him to vote Democrat. He wrote: “The choice between insane and sane… @elonmusk knows this. Bravo!

“So @elonmusk declared for freedom. Hugh Hewitt, conservative radio host, tweeted “Good.”

Tim Pool, an independent journalist, wrote that “[M]aybe left should reflect upon why people are fleeing from them.”

“Bingo, @elonmusk. While you don’t need to be a Republican to vote, you cannot be a Democrat. You must vote for Republican in order to save America. We can then discuss the details. “,” tweeted Dave Rubin, host of The Rubin Report.

The Hodge Twins, a conservative comedian, tweeted that “Elon Musk just announced he was voting Republican.” What would you expect from an genius?

Mark Kaye, a radio host, responded to the news by tweeting: “After supporting Democrats his entire life @elonmusk declares he will finally vote Republican.” If you’ve ever voted for a Republican, you can take pride in knowing you are smarter that the richest man on the planet.

Elizabeth Spiers, MSNBC’s political commentator, tweeted: “Given his epic story of lying and his real-world behavior I’d love to see evidence that [he] has ever *not* voted Republican.”

Former chief of staff to the former governor. Andrew Cuomo (D-N.Y.), Lindsey Boylan said, “This man just desires attention. He might be the richest man on the planet, but he is also one of the most powerful and craves attention. It is depressing to have so much but feel so poor. It is so depressing.

The post Elon Musk Lights Up Twitter After Declaring He’ll Vote GOP Next Election appeared first on Conservative Research Group.